Archive — Banking / Sovereign — 2008–2012 — Resolved

Iceland Banking Collapse 2008

Iceland’s three banks had liabilities 10 times GDP. All three collapsed in one week in October 2008. The government could not bail them out. Iceland defaulted, devalued, imposed capital controls — and recovered faster than Ireland.

2008 — 2012 ✓ Resolved
10x
Icelandic bank liabilities as multiple of Iceland GDP
1 week
Time for all three major banks to fail in October 2008
50%
Icelandic krona devaluation against euro
3yr
Years for Iceland to return to growth — faster than Ireland
✓ The Verdict
Default and capital controls worked. Iceland recovered faster than countries that chose bank bailouts and austerity. The lesson: when banks are too big to save, let them fail and protect the citizens instead.
What Happened

Iceland’s three major banks — Kaupthing, Landsbanki, and Glitnir — had grown to have assets totaling 10 times Iceland’s GDP, funding themselves with wholesale international borrowing. Icesave, an online savings product from Landsbanki, had attracted £5 billion from 400,000 depositors in the UK and Netherlands with high interest rates.

When the GFC hit global funding markets in September 2008, the Icelandic banks lost access to wholesale funding they needed to roll over. Within one week in October 2008, all three collapsed. The Icelandic government — a country of 300,000 people — could not bail out banks with liabilities equivalent to 10 times its GDP. It nationalized domestic operations and let foreign creditors fail.

The UK government froze Icelandic assets using anti-terrorism laws (a diplomatic catastrophe). Depositors in Icesave eventually received partial compensation years later. Iceland imposed capital controls, devalued the krona, and prosecuted banking executives. By 2011 growth had returned and Iceland was cited by economists including Paul Krugman as the model for crisis management.

The Mechanism
When banks are too big to save, not just too big to failThe TBTF doctrine assumes governments can afford to bail out systemically important banks. Iceland proved this assumption false when the banks exceed the sovereign's capacity. The Icelandic government faced a choice: bankrupt itself trying to save the banks, or let the banks fail and protect the domestic economy. Choosing the latter — with capital controls to prevent total capital flight — enabled a faster recovery than countries like Ireland that chose the bailout path.
What the Consensus Believed
The prevailing view before the reckoning
Icesave deposits were guaranteed by the Icelandic government. The banks were innovative financial institutions that had transformed Iceland into a financial hub. The government would find a way to honor all obligations. Iceland had graduated from fishing economy to financial services economy.
What the Record Shows
Banks can be too big to save
The TBTF doctrine has limits set by sovereign capacity. When bank liabilities exceed sovereign capacity, there is no bailout option — only triage.
Default plus devaluation beats austerity
Iceland’s recovery was faster than Ireland, which chose bank bailout and austerity. The debt overhang is the problem; eliminating it through default accelerates recovery.
Capital controls have a role in extreme situations
Iceland imposed capital controls against IMF advice and they worked. This changed the profession’s view of capital account management in extreme crises.
Prosecuting bankers matters for credibility
Iceland jailed 26 banking executives. This did not happen in the US or UK. Whether this accelerated the recovery is debated but it addressed the moral hazard problem directly.
↑ Cognitive pattern: Size Illusion — Equating bank asset growth with national prosperity
Key Voices
Called It Right
Paul Krugman
Princeton
“Iceland proving that default plus devaluation beats austerity. They recovered faster than Ireland which chose the alternative.”
June 2012 Right
Various analysts
Pre-crisis
“Iceland has liabilities 10 times GDP. If any one of them fails Iceland as a sovereign fails too.”
January 2008 Right — ignored
Wrong
Icelandic banks
Landsbanki / Kaupthing
“Icesave deposits are guaranteed by the Icelandic government. UK and Dutch depositors are completely safe.”
August 2008 Banks collapsed October 2008
Financial press
Various
“Iceland has become a model of financial innovation. The banking sector is a credit to the country.”
January 2007 Wrong
Narrative Timeline
● Consensus    ▲ Contrarian    ◆ Doomsday    | red line = resolution
Loading timeline...
Historical Analogs
Archive Record
Loading...